Impact of Early Myofunctional Therapy on Maxillary Arch Growth in Children Aged 4 to 7 with Mild Oral Habits: A Controlled Pilot Investigation
-
By
-
Qiwen Xiao
-
Junqing Ma
-
July 7, 2026
Clinical Report: Impact of Early Myofunctional Therapy on Maxillary Arch Growth
Overview
This pilot investigation evaluates the effects of early myofunctional therapy on maxillary arch growth in children aged 4 to 7 with mild oral habits. The intervention group exhibited increases in intercanine and intermolar widths, arch perimeter, and improvements in orofacial muscle function compared to controls.
Background
Oral habits such as thumb sucking and mouth breathing can adversely affect maxillary arch development in young children, potentially leading to malocclusion. Myofunctional therapy aims to correct orofacial muscle function and has been proposed as a non-invasive intervention to mitigate these effects. Understanding its impact on arch growth is crucial for developing preventive orthodontic strategies.
Data Highlights
| Measurement | Intervention Group (n=32) | Control Group (n=32) | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intercanine Width Increase | 3.42 ± 1.18 mm | 1.87 ± 0.95 mm | < 0.001 |
| Intermolar Width Increase | 2.76 ± 1.04 mm | 1.45 ± 0.88 mm | < 0.001 |
| Arch Perimeter Increase | 4.28 ± 1.56 mm | 2.34 ± 1.21 mm | < 0.001 |
| Habit Cessation Rate | 87.5% | 65.6% | 0.038 |
Key Findings
- Intervention group showed a significant increase in intercanine width compared to controls (3.42 mm vs. 1.87 mm; p < 0.001).
- Intervention group had a greater increase in intermolar width than controls (2.76 mm vs. 1.45 mm; p < 0.001).
- Arch perimeter increased significantly more in the intervention group (4.28 mm vs. 2.34 mm; p < 0.001).
- Higher habit cessation rate in the intervention group (87.5% vs. 65.6%; p = 0.038).
- Orofacial muscle function scores improved significantly more in the intervention group (p < 0.001).
Clinical Implications
The findings indicate that early myofunctional therapy may be associated with changes in maxillary arch development and habit cessation in children with mild oral habits.
Conclusion
Early myofunctional therapy may influence maxillary arch growth in young children with oral habits. Further research is needed to confirm these findings and explore long-term outcomes.
Related Resources & Content
- Frontiers, Source, 2026 -- Influence of early myofunctional training on maxillary arch development in children aged 4–7 years with mild oral habits: a controlled pilot study
- compendium — Achieving Better Occlusion, Esthetics, and Functional Stability With Clear Aligner Therapy
- compendium — Successful Aligner Therapy Meets Array of Treatment Objectives, Improves Occlusion and Function
- compendium — Restorative Management of Constriction and Spacing Following Arch Expansion
- conexiant — Palatal Expansion Linked to Better Hearing
- Overview - AAPD Policy on Obstructive Sleep Apnea
- Sleep-disordered breathing and orthodontics: An American Association of Orthodontists white paper update
- AAPD Policy on Pacifiers
- Mouth Breathing and Craniofacial Development in Children: A Systematic Narrative Review and Clinical Implications
- 2469_Araxi.indd
- Effectiveness of orofacial myofunctional therapy in improving orofacial function and oral habits: a scoping review - PubMed
- Frontiers | Influence of early myofunctional training on maxillary arch development in children aged 4–7 years with mild oral habits: a controlled pilot study
- Effects of rapid maxillary expansion and functional orthodontic treatment in children with sleep disordered breathing: a systematic review | BMC Oral Health | Springer Nature Link
Based on findings from:
Influence of early myofunctional training on maxillary arch development in children aged 4–7 years with mild oral habits: a controlled pilot study
Qiwen Xiao, Junqing Ma. Frontiers In Pediatrics, 2026.
https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/pediatrics/articles/10.3389/fped.2026.1809806/full
This content is an AI-generated, fully rewritten summary based on a published scholarly article. It does not reproduce the original text and is not a substitute for the original publication. Readers are encouraged to consult the source for full context, data, and methodology.