Comparative Evaluation of Growth Factor Bioavailability–Enhanced Allograft Vs Autogenous Bone Graft in Anterior Maxillary Ridge Augmentation - Summary - DentalSpire

Comparative Evaluation of Growth Factor Bioavailability–Enhanced Allograft Vs Autogenous Bone Graft in Anterior Maxillary Ridge Augmentation

  • By

  • Ren Chang, DDS

  • July 1, 2026

  • 10 min

Share

Objective:

To compare the outcomes of growth factor bioavailability–enhanced allograft (GFBA) and autogenous bone graft in anterior maxillary ridge augmentation.

Approach:
  • Case Presentation: A 44-year-old male with an atrophic alveolar ridge and periapical rarefying osteitis underwent extraction of tooth No. 7 and ridge augmentation using GFBA and an autogenous ramus block graft at site No. 8.
  • Surgical Procedure: The procedure involved extraction, socket debridement, and grafting with GFBA for site No. 7 and an autogenous block graft for site No. 8, followed by implant placement after healing.
Key Findings:
  • At 11 months, both GFBA and autogenous grafts demonstrated successful ridge augmentation.
  • The GFBA site showed a homogeneous trabecular pattern and advanced integration.
  • The autogenous graft exhibited ongoing remodeling and graft integration.
  • Implants were successfully placed at both sites with stable peri-implant bone levels.
Interpretation:

Limitations:
  • The study is based on a single case report, limiting generalizability.
  • Long-term outcomes beyond 11 months are not reported.
Conclusion:

Original Source(s)

Related Content