Early outcomes with a flexible ECAP based closed loop using multiplexed spinal cord stimulation waveforms—single-arm study with in-clinic randomized crossover testing - Scorecard - DentalSpire

Early outcomes with a flexible ECAP based closed loop using multiplexed spinal cord stimulation waveforms—single-arm study with in-clinic randomized crossover testing

  • By

  • Vahid Mohabbati

  • Richard Sullivan

  • James Yu

  • Peter Georgius

  • Charles D Brooker

  • Malgorzata Siorek

  • Nancy L McClelland

  • Filippo Coletti

  • Xiaoxi Sun

  • Abi Franke

  • Marc A Russo

  • May 16, 2025

  • 0 min

Share

Clinical Scorecard: Initial Results from a Flexible ECAP-Based Closed Loop Utilizing Multiplexed Spinal Cord Stimulation Waveforms: A Single-Arm Study with In-Clinic Randomized Crossover Evaluation

At a Glance

CategoryDetail
ConditionChronic neuropathic pain including low-back, leg, and upper limb pain
Key MechanismsClosed-loop spinal cord stimulation (CL-SCS) system using evoked compound action potentials (ECAPs) to automatically adjust stimulation amplitude up to 50 times per second
Target PopulationPatients with chronic neuropathic pain refractory to conservative treatment
Care SettingIn-clinic programming and at-home use with automated closed-loop adjustments

Key Highlights

  • CL-SCS system reduces overstimulation compared to open-loop (OL) fixed amplitude SCS, improving patient comfort.
  • 60% of subjects preferred below-perception waveforms during at-home use, indicating tolerability of imperceptible stimulation.
  • At 3 months, 86% of subjects with low-back/leg pain and all with upper limb pain reported ≥50% pain reduction relative to baseline.

Guideline-Based Recommendations

Diagnosis

  • Identify chronic neuropathic pain refractory to conservative treatments as indication for SCS.

Management

  • Use ECAP-based closed-loop SCS systems to provide consistent dosing by automatically adjusting stimulation amplitude in response to neural signals.
  • Program stimulation amplitude to patient comfort and allow delivery of various waveforms including multiplexed and high-frequency waveforms.
  • Consider closed-loop systems to reduce patient burden of manual adjustments and improve therapy consistency.

Monitoring & Follow-up

  • Evaluate patient-reported overstimulation and pain relief regularly, including in-clinic randomized crossover testing when feasible.
  • Monitor for changes in lead-to-cord distance and stimulation dose consistency during different postures and activities.

Risks

  • Overstimulation may cause discomfort or side effects such as muscle cramping, nausea, tinnitus, or headaches, especially with high-frequency waveforms.
  • Under-dosing due to patient adjustments or fixed amplitude settings may lead to inadequate pain relief and therapy discontinuation.

Patient & Prescribing Data

Sixty subjects implanted with the ECAP-based CL-SCS system, 54 completed 3-month follow-up

Majority preferred below-perception stimulation waveforms; closed-loop adjustment significantly reduced overstimulation and improved pain outcomes at 1 and 3 months

Clinical Best Practices

  • Implement ECAP-based closed-loop SCS to maintain consistent stimulation dose despite postural changes.
  • Program stimulation amplitude tailored to patient comfort, including imperceptible levels when preferred.
  • Use multiplexed and high-frequency waveforms to optimize analgesia while minimizing side effects.
  • Educate patients on the benefits of closed-loop systems to reduce manual adjustments and improve therapy adherence.
  • Regularly assess pain relief and overstimulation to guide therapy optimization.

References

Original Source(s)

Related Content